Egalitarianism, Tefillah and Halakhah

But to address what you're actually saying: This paper says unequivocally that men and women are obligated in prayer. How do you interpret that as "l'kula"?

Ok, now that I've read it: Even though some of us would have liked to see a more machmir conclusion (that all communities must be egalitarian), there is no doubt in my mind that this paper's conclusion l'kula (that it may be legitimate for some communities to be non-egalitarian if that is appropriate in their cultural context) was arrived at with integrity.

流水线，天元设计制造各种工业流水线.

BZ: It's not about your conclusions, but how you present them. If you're not telling people that they have to come to minyan, then how important is it that women are count to make one? That comment can be interpreted in two ways. One way is of saying "If there isn't anyone at minyan who cares that it's thoroughly egalitarian?" That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that your conclusions l'kula only appear to have integrity if sometimes your conclusions are annoying and if you sacrifice a little bit for them.

Meir Bet-
(Responding in general, not having read the paper yet,) if you believe your conclusions are the right ones, what's the value in reaching different conclusions on some issues just so that you look more nuanced?

I think it's important not to always side l'kula in your halachic arguments. I don't mean that in a petty way--being machmir on certain issues gives credence to your kulas. So I would appreciate seeing more articles that set firm boundaries on this site.

want to add page numbers ?

Magnificent paper. Wow. Im glad people are doing these kinds of things here.